Scotland West District Member's Report for Guild Council Meeting 30.11.2000



Glasgow & West of Scotland Group Meetings
There have been three group meetings held since the last report. The ten-pin bowling competition was won by the Royal Alexandra Hospital team ...... again. :o) The Business Meeting had it's usual abysmal attendance, but some useful discussions on the motions. The joint meeting with the local RPSGB branch was addressed by Clare Mackie. Unfortunately I was unable to attend this meeting.

back to top

Organisational Changes
The pharmacy review at North Glasgow Hospitals has come to a halt. Efforts to restart it are being made, and the MSF Regional Officer has arranged to have meetings with staff on each site involved. A verbal update will hopefully be available at Council.

The pharmacy review in Argyll & Clyde Acute Trust is ongoing.

back to top

Staffing
Several new posts within Argyll & Clyde Acute Trust were advertised recently in the Pharmaceutical Journal. A new E grade medicines management post at St. John's Hospital in Livingston has been advertised with less response than expected. It will probably be readvertised soon.

Several other posts in various trusts have been advertised without any success. These range from grades B to D. A B grade post with no applicants at Falkirk Royal Infirmary is to be readvertised as MTO3 clinical posts.

I have been informed of two resignations from the Guild. One member has left for community pharmacy, while the other has gone to Bermuda!

back to top

Modernisation Forum
I am grateful to Council for confirming that it was appropriate that I attend this group as the Secretary for Scotland.

There have been two meetings of the Modernisation Forum since the last report was written. Notes of both have been circulated to Council, the Association of Scottish Trust Chief Pharmacists and local Reps in Scotland and are available on the www.ghpscot.org.uk website.

I was asked to prepare a submission for the Scottish NHS Plan which was compiled with assistance from the President, Vice-president, Professional Secretary, Jim Bannerman and Don Page. Members within Scotland were invited to make their comments on what they would like to see included in the submission, and a number responded very helpfully to the invitation. The submission was distributed in a similar manner to the meeting notes and is also available on the website.

back to top

Scottish NHS Committee 8.11.2000

Michael Fuller: The Scottish NHS Committee will need to discuss the repercussions from the decision taken at the recalled MSF conference this weekend. The result should be known early next week. The Scottish NHS Conference takes place the following weekend, 18/19th November. There are 63 delegates and 29 resolutions.

Pay: Modernisation timetable: It is reckoned that it will now be August 2001 before everything is settled and Agenda for Change goes out for consultation. There is to be a meeting of SPRIG on Friday 10th November. The meeting will attempt to decide whether Scotland agrees in principle to having early implementers. It is probable that it will be April 2003 before there is full implementation, with early implementers starting in April 2002. There will be a lot of work for reps involved in evaluating every job within their trusts. The committee had no objections to the principle as it should ensure that the Scottish dimension is included in the assessment; something which would not happen if the service relied on experience in England picking up all the problems.

Partnership: The visits are continuing, with Orkney, Shetland and the Western Isles visited recently. The Western Isles visit did not go well, with neither the Chief Executive nor Deputy Chief Executive attending. Both are now being called in to the Scottish Executive, at their own expense, to a meeting with Gerry Marr, Robin Naismith and Michael Fuller. They will be told that improvements will have to be made before the next visit. The Scottish Partnership Forum is basically flexing its muscles and this should send out the correct messages to the service.

Organisational Change: The current policy goes on to the end of March. Management are saying that the policy is a major problem, though, and there is likely to be a full and frank discussion between now and March. A survey is ongoing to identify where the problems are. With major changes on the horizon, absolute pay protection for life and no compulsory redundancies are vital. Obviously, management are concerned with the costs in the future. The original policy apparently excluded senior managers, but the current one applies to everyone.

Education and Training Strategy: The deadline of 31.12.00 for personal development plans and learning plans for every organisation still stands. Few trusts appear to be taking this deadline seriously, though. Everyone should have a half-hour interview with their manager to allow a template to be completed for incorporation into the Trust plan. The Implementation Group will act as an umbrella group for all the different groups involved in training. The £6m funding is pump priming only - the real money is going to have to come out of existing budgets. The question was asked - what happens when 3/4 of Scottish Trusts fail to comply by 31st December? That decision will need to be taken at the Health Department.

Occupational Health Services: The aim is to be the best in Scotland bar none. The service should be so good that it can sell its services to private companies.

Partnership Courses: There is a need for the Scottish Executive Group and the Full Time Officers to discuss the training requirements for next year. There is a week in December 2001 booked for senior reps, and the union has been awards £50k for partnership training in the NHS.

Scottish Health Plan: The plan has been delayed until the middle of December. As previously stated, they are intending to build upon the work already in place e.g. the English NHS Plan and the work being done by the hundreds of expert groups already working on modernising services. England is currently reckoned to be about 2 years behind Scotland in HR practices. To produce and implement the Plan in Scotland, there are several aspects / groups / people involved -

  • Project Team
  • Six Network Co-ordinating Groups
    • Policy Development & Public Involvement
    • Service Delivery
    • Governance & Systems Change
    • Improving Health
    • Workforce (& Workplace)
    • Resource Issues
  • Modernisation Board
  • Modernisation Forum
  • Health Department Board
  • Ministers

The need for change has three main points

1. The current structure is unsustainable :
  • Technology will radically change the way of working e.g. telemedicine
  • Consumerism has led to increased expectations
  • Life balance - demography and the health of the workforce
2. Current service delivery is unsustainable :
  • Methods are complex and need to be simplified
  • Agencies should be working together
  • Changing life patterns and hours of opening
3. Current professional groupings are unsustainable? :
  • Job design - multiskilling and team working. Training in isolation leads to difficulties in teamworking. Full training is required e.g. from Assistant Technical Officer to Trust Chief Pharmacist including all steps in between.
  • State Registration / Professional Regulation - criteria required
  • Career development and unqualified practitioners

Possible Key Result Areas - Workforce (SEHD)

  • Performance assessment criteria for Human Resources (People Governance)
  • New contractual models for doctors
  • Extended roles for health professionals (Intermediate specialists? / Consultant pharmacists?)
  • PIN guidelines on improving the workplace and working practices
  • Workforce planning and supply issues
  • Pay modernisation

Resources or Redesign?

  • Medium term growth - it is a 3 year investment for reform.
  • The workforce amounts to 70% of NHS costs. How can it be used most effectively and efficiently?
  • Structure of education for health professionals. Under- and post-graduate training should stimulate multi-disciplinary working.
  • New gateways into the NHS
  • Redesign the workforce to match new patterns of service. Professionals should be working to the top end of their skills and developing them - creating new professionals.
  • Invest strategically. Targeted bids for money.
  • Voluntary Sector - 1500-2000 agencies that account for 1% of NHS funding. They are complementary to the NHS and cost effective. Should there be increased regulation of their work? What is their relationship to workers in the NHS?

The key to the debate is not what is in the plan, but ownership of how the plan is fed through the system. The Scottish Partnership Forum want it to come out through Partnership Forum structures and not management structures. This would ensure that in future nothing would go through anything other than the Partnership Forum. The Partnership Forum might not necessarily want to contribute, but everything must go through it.

The agendas for the Trust partnership fora will change considerably within the next year or so. It is possible/likely? that Terms and Conditions might be split from the partnership forum within the next year, because the partnership agenda will be so massive.

If patients are treated at home; go to the Health Centre if necessary and only go into hospital if absolutely necessary, then there will be massive changes for all services. There will be major discussions on just what services hospitals provide, and a lot of the existing services will be pushed out into primary care.

There will be major changes in the structure. The top-down structure has been prevalent for 50 years, and partnership working is foreign to most people. This is a problem since the trusts have pressure on them to deliver results and many managers see partnership as slowing down the process and try to sideline it.

back to top

Continuing Professional Development Guideline Development Group
The two most recent meetings of this group coincided with annual leave, so I was unable to attend either. The next meeting takes place on 5th December, and I have been invited to a workshop on the implementation of Learning Together which will give details of all the Project Development Groups and their conclusions so far. This meeting takes place on 11th December. I should be able to attend both.

back to top

Advice
I have given advice on regrading, on-call and a couple of other situations. Several Trusts have plans for extending services over the winter period and advice has been supplied to a number of members on this subject.

back to top

'ghp'
Suggestions for future articles include more on CPD, personal development plans and skill mix issues. Similar information would be useful to have on the GHP website.

Group News
The delegates to this years GDM will be the Chair and the Secretary of the Group, Kay Roberts and Rhona Dykes respectively.

We still have a vacancy for Vice-chairman of the Group. If anyone is interested, please contact a member of the Group Committee.

back to top

Colin Rodden
17 November 2000

back to top